Clicky

Occupy the Hood? Occupy Austin event to attract blacks offends some

occupy austin 26 Occupy the Hood? Occupy Austin event to attract blacks offends some

Occupy Austin is looking attract more black support.

UPDATE: It appears that Occupy Austin has removed all of its original “Occupy the Hood” Facebook postings and comments. We have been unable to find the posts in several searches of their Facebook page.

According to Austin’s YNN, very few Occupy Austin protesters attended the event in East Austin. YNN reported that approximately 40 people attended the event. Curiously, YNN left the phrase “Occupy the Hood” out of all of their reporting.

AUSTIN, TEXAS – Occupy Austin announced on their Facebook page an event tomorrow that they have dubbed “Occupy the Hood”. Similar “Occupy the Hood” events will take place in cities around the country.

The Occupy Wall Street movement has been largely defined and criticized as being a group of angry, white males. The progressive business magazine FastCompany conducted a revealing study this month that found that 81.2 percent of Occupy Wall Street supporters are white and 61 percent are male. Only 1.6 percent of supporters are black. Hispanics only make up 6.8 percent.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 77 percent of the U.S. population is white and 12 percent is black.

Occupy Austin organizers are promising to address African-American issues.

“We need a large turnout of angry, upset, pissed-off citizens to come out and join us in saying that it is time to put the people FIRST and to insure equal access to opportunity.”

But the choice of the name “Occupy the Hood” isn’t sitting well with some Occupy Austin supporters.

African-American Jessica Brown wrote on the Occupy Austin Facebook page, “I think the first thing to ensure African-American issues are addressed is not to call it Occupy the hood, not all african americans live in the “hood” or “ghetto”.

Supporter Jeff Questad posted, “I hope a bunch of white people didn’t come up with that name, or this statement which sounds slightly liberal patronizing. I know the intention is good, but using that language and acting like African Americans have to be pursued so the movement doesn’t go forth without a contingent is a bad foot to start off on in my opinion.”

Johnny Mudbug Williams wrote, “Isn’t this just more segregation? do black people need their own occupy movement?”

Occupy the Hood will start at 2 p.m and protesters are meeting in the parking lot at the Simpson United Methodist Church at 1709 E. 12th St.

From the Occupy Austin Facebook page:

“This is part of a nationwide effort to insure that African-American issues are addressed in the Occupy movement. Speakers, entertainers and everyday citizens will address the disparities that keep Blacks at the bottom of the American totem pole. We will talk about what’s being done and what needs to be done and to have a chance at success we need YOU! We need a large turnout of angry, upset, pissed-off citizens to come out and join us in saying that it is time to put the people FIRST and to insure equal access to opportunity.”

About Jack Hambrick

Publisher and Editor-in-Chief, The Digital Texan
Jack is Editor-in-Chief at The Digital Texan and writes about news, gossip and lifestyles in Austin. He's a former television reporter with KPRC TV Houston, WFTV TV Orlando, WFOR TV Miami, and WSFL TV /Sun-Sentinel Fort Lauderdale.
Google+
Email

  • http://www.facebook.com/jeff.questad Jeff Questad

    I am no way offended by the effort to expand Occupy Austin’s reach. I asked if this was going forth with or without input from the African American activist groups. An Occupy Austin person replied that it was coordinated with them. I said great, I was hoping that would be the case. I know the author saw my second comment because he identified me as a supporter. He just chose not to use it because it didn’t support the theme of this article.

    Occupy Austin is open in all its manifestations, including the Facebook page where people freely ask questions and debate issues. A few days ago there a discussion about about a march. If someone asked how the times were chosen, nobody would go write an article claiming using clocks was offending people.

    I’m completely supportive of Occupy Austin and if you’ve gotten the idea from this article that a number of people said there was a problem, subtract me from that number. — JQ

  • Jacksonfive

    Haha @ calling it “this article.” This isn’t an article; this is a collection of Facebook comments. It’s not journalism, so what’s to get upset about? “John Hambrick” is probably a bot. If not, I’m guessing he’s homebound. Impetigo?

  • http://twitter.com/MotherGoos3 Mother Goose

    I should think that Van Jones would already be taking care of this. After all, he wouldn’t want the the occupy movement to be all angry white people like the TEA Party movement (NOT)

  • http://www.facebook.com/deannajjones Deanna Jones

    Occupy the Hood already exists, and Austin didn’t invent it. Don’t we research before writing articles any more?

  • The12percent

    No one said they invented it. The article says that some objected to the name and then OA “whitewashed” it. The only hoods are the white hoods worn by OA.

  • Paradisegray

    There is nothing offensive about the name “Occupy The Hood”

    Occupy The Hood was founded at “Occupy Wall Street by Malik Rahsaan and Detroit’s Ife Johari Uhuru